Bridge theory and practice
Compliance standards — NIAP Protection Profiles, STIG policies, Capability Package requirements — translated into practical steps that engineers, integrators, and mission planners can execute without a legal reading.
CSfC lets you carry classified data on commercial phones and tablets — and the same layered architecture underpins high-security deployments below that threshold. The framework is public; the hard part is turning hundreds of pages of requirements into a build your team can actually field. That translation is what we do.
Built on commercial off-the-shelf hardware — no custom silicon, no multi-year wait.
Every engagement comes back to the same problem: the requirements are public, but nobody hands you the build. We close that gap.
Dual-layer encryption, VPN tunneling, and Data-at-Rest frameworks broken down into straightforward blueprints for modern end-user devices — diagrams your engineers can build from, not paragraphs they have to decode.
Open the resource library 02Guidance tailored to the endpoint in your hand: Android and iOS smartphones and rugged tablets operating in tactical or enterprise environments. Different form factors, different constraints, different answers.
Browse deployments by platformCompliance standards — NIAP Protection Profiles, STIG policies, Capability Package requirements — translated into practical steps that engineers, integrators, and mission planners can execute without a legal reading.
The whole point of CSfC is leveraging commercial off-the-shelf technology to reach secure classified mobility in months rather than years. We help teams take that path instead of rediscovering it.
CSfC protects classified data by wrapping it in two nested encryption tunnels built from different products, so a flaw in one layer never exposes the data underneath. Here is that path, end to end.
The two layers must come from genuinely different implementations. Repeating a vendor collapses two layers into one shared failure mode — and the design will not register.
Protecting the tunnel says nothing about the powered-off device. DAR solutions layer their own encryption on the endpoint, with a separate Capability Package and separate design decisions.
Solutions are registered with NSA against a compliance checklist. Designing with that checklist in view from day one is the difference between a build and a rebuild.
Android dominates CSfC mobile deployments, but "Android" is not one decision. Google and Samsung take measurably different approaches to the pieces CSfC actually cares about — certification cadence, the Data-at-Rest story, and how much of the stack comes from a single vendor. Picking the wrong one costs you a redesign, not a settings change.
First-party silicon, the fastest Common Criteria cadence in Android, and a clean AOSP baseline — with a Data-at-Rest gap you have to fill yourself.
Knox brings something Google does not: an NSA-approved inner encryption layer built into the platform, plus hardware purpose-built for the tactical edge.
Both platforms carry impressive certifications. Neither is CSfC-compliant on its own. The device is one component in a registered architecture that also includes your VPN layers, gateways, management infrastructure, and a compliance checklist. Start from the Capability Package, not from the datasheet.
Capability Packages move. Designing against a superseded version is one of the most expensive mistakes a program can make, so we keep the current state visible.
| Capability Package | Version | Published | Covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile AccessMA | v2.8.0 | 27 Mar 2026 | Remote access for mobile end user devices |
| Multi-Site ConnectivityMSC | v1.3.0 | 27 Mar 2026 | Linking enclaves across untrusted networks |
| Campus WLANCWLAN | v3.2.0 | 27 Mar 2026 | Classified Wi-Fi inside a controlled campus |
| Data-at-RestDAR | v5.1.0 | Mar 2026 | Layered encryption on the storage itself |
| TacticalTACT | v1.0.0 | 1 Jul 2024 | Deployments at the tactical edge |
Standing up the tunnels, the gateways, and the device configuration — and answering for every one of them.
Assembling components from the approved list into something that registers the first time.
Deciding what secure mobility actually enables at the edge, and what it costs to get there.
Scoping timelines and budgets against a framework that rewards getting the design right early.
ApexCSFC exists for a simple reason: the frameworks that govern secure mobility are publicly documented, rigorously specified, and genuinely difficult to act on. We deliver simple, actionable breakdowns across both halves of the problem — high security solutions built on NIAP-validated devices, DISA STIGs and hardened UEM baselines for sensitive and CUI work, and full CSfC architectures for data that is classified — on smartphones and tablets, so teams spend their time building rather than interpreting.
Your background goes here. A short paragraph on who is behind ApexCSFC: years in the space, programs supported, relevant credentials or clearances you're willing to state publicly.
This is the section that converts a curious visitor into an inquiry, so it is worth writing yourself. Two or three paragraphs, plus a headshot, is the right size. Send me the details and I'll fold them in.
Whether you're scoping a first CSfC deployment or untangling a design that stalled, start with a conversation. No obligation, no procurement pressure.